TINA MARIE ARNOLD, A MINOR, BY HER NEXT FRIEND, MERRITT M. ARNOLD, AND MERRITT M. ARNOLD, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE CLARKE-GRAVELY CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS GRAVELY CORPORATION, APPELLEE
TINA MARIE ARNOLD, A MINOR, BY HER NEXT FRIEND, MERRITT M. ARNOLD, AND MERRITT M. ARNOLD, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANTS,
THE CLARKE-GRAVELY CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS GRAVELY CORPORATION, APPELLEE
273 So. 2d 400
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
The record on appeal and the briefs of the parties herein having been fully considered, and it appearing therefrom that appellants have failed to demonstrate that the judgment appealed is erroneous, the said judgment is therefore affirmed.
SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Division OF Administration v. W. Palm Beach Garden Club, 352 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)…ned for park use [*1180] and has in fact been a park for over thirty years. We note the Federal grant and master plan to further develop it. The First District was faced with a somewhat similar problem in State Department of Transportation v. Byrd, 273 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973), where the real estate involved was a recreational facility serving the citizens of Daytona Beach. The court in that case held that an appraisal based on fair market value would not be proper, due to the “special use” of the parc…