CALVIN WILBERT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1973-02-28
No. 72-303
REED, C. J., and WALDEN, J., concur.
273 So. 2d 769 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support a first-degree murder conviction, even if the arrest was illegal, because the killing was premeditated.


Headnotes

[1] A killing that occurs during an illegal arrest may still constitute first-degree murder if it results from premeditation.

[2] The right to resist an illegal arrest is limited to the use of reasonable force, and does not justify the use of unnecessary force.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was convicted of first-degree murder and assault with intent to commit murder after shooting two police officers during an attempted arrest.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
OWEN, Judge.

OWEN, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of first degree murder of a police officer, and also convicted of assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree as to another police officer. Because none of the several points raised on this direct appeal require reversal, each of the judgments and sentences is severally affirmed.

Appellant contends that since the killing occurred while he was justifiably resisting an illegal arrest, the case of Alday v. State, Fla.1952, 57 So.2d 333 requires that we reduce the first degree murder conviction to manslaughter. We conceive that appellant has misconstrued the holding of the cited case.

Assuming arguendo (but expressly not deciding) that the arrest was illegal, the Alday case makes it clear that appellant had the right to use only reasonable force in resisting, and would not be justified in using unnecessary force, nor would the fact that the killing occurred during an illegal arrest preclude a conviction for murder if it resulted front, premeditation. See, Roberson v. State, 1901, 43 Fla. 156, 29 So. 535 and Weaver v. State, Fla.App.1969, 220 So.2d 53.

The jury was correctly charged on premeditation and the competent evidence is more than sufficient to establish a valid basis upon which the jury could have found that the killing was indeed premeditated. The incident occurred in broad daylight on a street of a large city. Both police officers were in uniform and had just stepped out of a marked police cruiser when they attempted to stop appellant for questioning. Apellant scuffled with one of the officers, then broke and ran. He was captured after a chase of more than a city block. Appellant again struggled with the officers, attempting to seize the service revolver of one of the officers, and stating that he would kill the officers. The struggle continued and appellant was successful in removing the officer’s service revolver from *770its holster, shooting one officer twice and the other at least once.

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Phillips v. State, 314 So. 2d 619 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)
    …ntrary. Further, every person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest, and may use such force as is necessary to effect his escape. Alday v. State, 57 So. 2d 333 (Fla.1952); Gay v. State, 147 Fla. 690, 3 So. 2d 514 (1941); Cf., Wilbert v. State, 273 So. 2d 769 (4th DCA Fla. 1973); see 5 Am.Jur.2d Arrest §. 94 (1962); 6 C.J.S. Arrest § 13 (1937), Supp. (1974). Although appellant was not within the confines of his home, if a person arrested without a warrant is to be convicted of resisting that arrest with…
  • Lovette v. State, 302 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Rosenberg v. State, Fla. App. 1972, 264 So. 2d 68 and Wilbert v. State, Fla.App. 1973, 273 So. 2d 769.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw