JAMES THOMAS

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• Dydek v. State, 400 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)
  …did not raise this precise issue either in the trial court or on this appeal, an appellate court will always consider a fundamental error that is apparent on the face of the record. Wyche v. State, 178 So. 2d 875 (Fla.2d DCA 1965), appeal dismissed, 188 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 1966). Fundamental error has been defined as error which goes to the foundation of the ease or to the merits of the cause of action. Sanford v. Rubin, 231 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 1970). We can think of no error more fundamental than the conviction of…
• Hoover v. State, 511 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
  …tal is to comprehend a primary factor as basically essential to the object and purpose in view. Here the purpose is the administration of justice in keeping with the Constitution. [*634] Wyche v. State, 178 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965), app. dism., 188 So. 2d 310 (Fla.1966), in which the court reversed separate sentences imposed for two offenses involving the same transaction, even though the error was not assigned or argued before it. Radford v. Town of Palm Beach Shores, 267 So. 2d 36, 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 19…

Authorities Cited

• Harper & Bateman Pickle Co., Inc. v. Seashore Food Prods., Inc., 179 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)