STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
KEEL KILKER AND DONALD J. HUFFMASTER, APPELLEES

Fla. 2d DCA | 1973-03-09
No. 72-728
LILES, A. C. J., and HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
274 So. 2d 249 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Rutskin v. State, Fla.App.1972, 260 So.2d 525.

LILES, A. C. J., and HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Lifschitz v. Filomena Troccoli and Emilio Troccoli, 436 So. 2d 951 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
    …e used due care under the circumstances are issues properly left for the jury, see City of Jacksonville v. Stokes, 74 So. 2d 278 (Fla.1954); Brown v. McArthur Dairies, Inc., 280 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Bryant v. Florida Inland Theatres, Inc., 274 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973), and (2) Lifschitz has failed to meet his burden of demonstrating prejudicial error regarding comments of the trial court, see Thompson v. Martin, 216 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968). Affirmed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw