ROY M. PACKARD, ET AL.,
v.
EDWARD E. STEVENS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decree, finding no errors in the record after reviewing the transcript, briefs, and arguments presented by both parties.
The Florida Supreme Court found no errors in the decree of the Circuit Court.
“it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree”
This quote directly states the court's finding regarding the lower court's decree.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe case was submitted to the Florida Supreme Court on a transcript of the record of a decree from the Circuit Court, along with briefs and arguments …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Review cases and more on FLexlaw
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. See Luers v. Kuykendall, 135 Fla. 644, 185 So. 448; R. D. Lamar, Inc., v. Ray, 132 Fla. 704, 182 So. 292.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur.
Buford, J., concurs in opinion and judgment.
Chief Justice Terrell and Justice Ti-iomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- R. D. Lamar, Inc. v. Ray, 132 Fla. 704 (Fla. 1938)
- Luers v. Kuykendall, 135 Fla. 644 (Fla. 1938)