JAMES MALTA, PETITIONER,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Gibson v. AVIS Rent-A-Car Sys., Inc., 386 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 1980)
  …(Fla.1977); Exchange Bank of St. Augustine v. Florida Nat’l Bank of Jacksonville, 292 So. 2d 361 (Fla.1974); Cruz v. Hundley, 371 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Garland, 269 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972) cert. denied 275 So. 2d 14 (Fla.1973); Savarese v. Hill, 128 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961). Another way of stating the question whether the intervening cause was foreseeable is to ask whether the harm that occurred was within the scope of the danger attributable to the defen…
• Stahl v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 438 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …(Fla.1977); Exchange Bank of St. Augustine v. Florida Nat’l Bank of Jacksonville, 292 So. 2d 361 (Fla.1974); Cruz v. Hundley, 371 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Garland, 269 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972) cert. denied 275 So. 2d 14 (Fla.1973); Savarese v. Hill, 128 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961). Another way of stating the question whether the intervening cause was foreseeable is to ask whether the harm that occurred was within the scope of the danger attributable to the defen…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Gertrude Tozier v. Jarvis, 469 So. 2d 884 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
  …defendant raised the presumption as a defense, but it was held to be rebutted by plaintiffs evidence that the defendant’s vehicle was improperly stopped. In Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Garland, 269 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972), cert. denied, 275 So. 2d 14 (Fla.1973), the presumption was held to be rebutted as applied to plaintiff’s decedent, who struck the rear of a bus that was stopped improperly on an expressway. Because the defendant driver of the stopped vehicle had improperly stopped to pick up…