GEORGE STEINC, JR., APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Beasley v. State, 18 So. 3d 473 (Fla. 2009)
  …nsel does not act unreasonably in not pursuing them. See Reed v. State, 875 So. 2d 415, 432 (Fla.2004). A motion to exclude the shirt based on a break in the chain of custody required specific allegations of probable tampering. See Bernard v. State, 275 So. 2d 34, 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). Trial counsel testified that there was no indication of tampering, and the defense team did not believe that they possessed a basis to exclude the shirt. Postconviction counsel has alluded to a discrepancy between when the sh…
• Watson v. State, 437 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
  …must determine that the object is in substantially the same condition as when it was procured. Continuous custody of the object is only one factor to be considered. Beck v. State, 405 So. 2d 1365, 1367 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); see also Bernard v. State, 275 So. 2d 34, 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973) and Stevens v. State, 245 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). Although the whereabouts of the cassette involved herein were not fully explained, cf. Jones v. State, 253 So. 2d 154, 156 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971) and Stunson v. State, 228 S…
• Masse v. State, 292 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed on authority of Urga v. State, Fla.App.1963, 155 So. 2d 719; Stunson v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So. 2d 294; Bernard v. State, Fla.App.1973, 275 So. 2d 34.…

Authorities Cited

• Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (U.S. 1972)