REICH

v.

MAZURSKY

Citator

Cited By

• Waltraud Mary Sexsmith Clark and Richard J. Clark v. The Boeing Co., 395 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …e avoided is obvious to all. See Evans v. General Motors Corporation, 359 F. 2d 822 (7th Cir.1966); Campo v. Scofield, 301 N.Y. 468, 95 N.E. 2d 802 (1950). Royal v. Black and Decker Manufacturing Co., 205 So. 2d 307, 310 (Fla.3d DCA), cert. denied, 211 So. 2d 214 (Fla.1968)1 (footnote omitted). The claim that defects in the engine or aircraft were the proximate cause of appellant’s multiple sclerosis appears only as a conclusion and not through well-plead allegations. A knowing misuse of a manufacturer’s pr…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Helga Huget and Vera Bothman v. City OF Miami Beach, 458 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See West v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 336 So. 2d 80 (Fla.1976); Halpryn v. Highland Insurance Co., 426 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Royal v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co., 205 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967), cert. denied, 211 So. 2d 214 (Fla.1968). See also U.S. Flourescent Manufacturing Co. v. Florida Power & Light Co., 360 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Bush v. City of Dania, 121 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960).…
• Light v. Weldarc Co., Inc., 569 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)
  …eably probable. The question turns on what is reasonable care and what is reasonable safety. Prosser, The Law of Torts 644-45 (4th ed. 1978). See also Royal v. Black and Decker Manufacturing Company, 205 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967), cert. denied, 211 So. 2d 214 (Fla.1968). The record is clear that the glasses in question lacked a safety strap or other device to prevent them from slipping in the sweaty environment of the workplace. Whether Weldare breached its duty of care in designing the glasses without s…

Authorities Cited

• Rosalyn Reich v. Mazursky, 205 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)