ROBERT MUELLER, APPELLANT,
v.
DOLORES MUELLER, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1973-04-10
No. 72-992
Before HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ., and SACK, MARTIN, Associate Judge.
275 So. 2d 585 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant husband seeks review of an order reinstating the alimony provision of a final decree of divorce.

We have carefully considered the record in this cause in light of the controlling principles of law, arguments and briefs of counsel and have concluded that no abuse of the chancellor’s discretion has been made to appear.

Nothing in this opinion is to be construed to be in derogation of the rights of the parties to seek future modification of the alimony award in compliance with § 61.14, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., if the circumstances, financial abilities or needs of the parties change in the future.

Accordingly, the order appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Mueller v. Mueller, 280 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1973)
    …Certiorari denied. 275 So. 2d 585. CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw