DAVID L. BINGHAM, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Rural NEW Town, Inc. v. Palm Beach Cnty., 315 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)
  …t fairly debatable; and that the appellee failed to rebut by competent substantial evidence the overwhelming proof adduced by the appellant the property should be rezoned from agriculture to residential. Stokes v. City of Jacksonville, Fla.App.1973, 276 So. 2d 200; City of St. Petersburg v. Aikin, Fla.1968, 217 So. 2d 315; Hall v. Korth, Fla.App.1971, 244 So. 2d 766; City of Miami v. Schutte, Fla.App.1972, 262 So. 2d 14; cf. Metropolitan Dade County v. Kanter, Fla.App.1967, 200 So. 2d 624; McCormick v. City o…
• Alachua Cnty. v. Reddick, 368 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
  …” both in the sense of immediate consequences and in the sense of an immediately discernable portent of certain future harm. It is appropriate to add a word distinguishing the circumstances in this case from those in Stokes v. City of Jacksonville, 276 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973), Davis v. Sails, supra, Olive v. City of Jacksonville, 328 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), and Dugan v. City of Jacksonville, 343 So. 2d 103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), in all of which this court ordered, or sustained a trial court whic…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Olive v. City OF Jacksonville, 328 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
  …that to which they are entitled but did not request) would constitute spot zoning in reverse (Kugel v. City of Miami Beach, supra). Closely analogous to the facts of this case are those appearing in Stokes v. City of Jacksonville, FlaApp.1st 1973, 276 So. 2d 200, wherein the appellants’ properties constituted a peninsula of residentially zoned lots surrounded by commercial classifications and usages. In that case, we said: “These residents purchased their homes many years ago in a relatively quiet resident…