ROBERT JOHN ERLER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion For Postconviction Relief cases and more on FLexlaw
On the basis of our review of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion that the motion for post-conviction relief contains sufficient allegations to entitle appellant to an evidentiary hearing under Rule 3.850, FRCrP., 33 F.S. A. Blackman v. State, Fla.App.1971, 256 So.2d 18. See also Brady v. Maryland, 373 *499U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). Cf. Fast v. State, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 203; Estevez v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 697; Marti v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 506; Estrella v. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d 489; Sampson v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 771; and Thomas v. State, Fla.App.1968, 210 So.2d 488.
Accordingly, the order appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for the purpose of providing an evidentiary hearing.
OWEN and MAGER, JJ., and MORROW, RUSSELL O., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (U.S. 1963)
- Marti v. State, 163 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
- Arthur v. Sampson, 158 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
- Fast v. State, 221 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
- Eligha Thomas v. State, 210 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)
- Estrella v. State, 215 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
- Estevez v. State, 206 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)
- Melton D. Blackman v. State, 256 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)