JERROLD A. BROSS ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, DIVISION OF PERSONNEL AND RETIREMENT, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 1973-05-03
No. R-227
WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., RAWLS, J., and WHITWORTH, LEWIS B., Associate Judge, concur.
277 So. 2d 36 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1973) Caution
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. Chapter 70-112, Section 2(15), Laws of Florida; City of Coral Gables v. State ex rel. Worley (Fla.1950), 44 So.2d 298; Hunter v. Solomon (Fla.1954), 75 So.2d 803; State ex rel. Cone Bros. Contracting Co. v. King (Fla.1951), 50 So.2d 175.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., RAWLS, J., and WHITWORTH, LEWIS B., Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • The Dep't OF Admin. of the State of Fla. v. Brown, 334 So. 2d 355 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
    …ption and duties of the various positions does not warrant approval.” . Appellant suggests that we must adhere to our prior decision to the effect that state attorneys were subject to the hazardous classifications of Administration. Bross v. State, 277 So. 2d 36 (Pla.App. 1st 1973). That case, however, involved state employees in the catch-all clause of the pre-1975 statute, for which hazard was a statutory requisite.…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw