HARRY C. BUNCH
v.
J. W. POPHAM, ET UX.
HARRY C. BUNCH
J. W. POPHAM, ET UX.
144 Fla. 329
Florida Supreme Court (1940)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 198 So. 14
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Appeal is from decree dismissing bill of complaint.
The bill of complaint entirely failed to state grounds for .equitable relief and showed that if plaintiff had any cause of action it was one enforceable at law.
The record discloses no reversible error.
Decree is affirmed.
So ordered.
*330Affirmed.
Terrell, C. J., an'd Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur.
Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment.
Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Corut.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Princess Vladimir Eristavitchitcherine v. Miami Beach Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 154 Fla. 100 (Fla. 1944)…, 52 Fla. 507, 42 So. 705; Buck v. All Parties, etc., 86 Fla. 86, 97 So. 313; Ocean Frontage Company v. McFadden, 98 Fla. 197, 123 So. 666; Bartlett & Sons Company v. Pan-American Studios, 144 Fla. 631, 198 So. 195; Edwards v. Edwards, 144 Fla. 374, 198 So. 14. Nor does the filing of briefs to the merits by an appellee, as here, cure the defect, as the parties cannot confer, by waiver or consent, jurisdiction of the subject matter where such jurisdiction does not legally exist. In the recent case of Holl…
-
Ira Reamer v. Reamer, 361 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)…value affixed on the property. No such attack was made on the appraisal, the order of the trial judge requiring a sale in compliance with the previous property settlement Agreement of the parties is hereby affirmed: Edwards v. Edwards, 144 Fla. 374, 198 So. 14 (1940); Herman A. Thomas, Inc. v. Sharpe, 309 So. 2d 592 (Fla.3d DCA 1975). Affirmed.…