LARRY CRITTENDEN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
LARRY CRITTENDEN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
277 So. 2d 559
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1973)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed on authority of Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970); United States v. Battle, 467 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1972).
SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Drakes v. State, 400 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)…0(b), and it was waived. Chapman v. State, 389 So. 2d 1065 (Fla.5th DCA 1980). The value of the property taken must be established as an essential element of the crime of grand larceny. Negron v. State, 306 So. 2d 104 (Fla.1974); Tribble v. State, 277 So. 2d 559 (Fla.3d DCA 1973); Smart v. State, 274 So. 2d 577 (Fla.2d DCA 1973). The state attorney, attempting to prove value, elicited only testimony that all of the property stolen from the Turner house, including the gun, was worth between $1,500 and $1,700…
Authorities Cited
- Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (U.S. 1970)
- United States v. Battle, 467 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1972)