DAVID FENTON AND DAVID MUSKAT, APPELLANTS,
v.
JOSEPH TEICHMAN AND DOROTHY TEICHMAN, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1973-05-22
No. 72-1247
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
277 So. 2d 562 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Curran & MacDonell, Inc. v. Pearre, Fla.App. 1967, 202 So.2d 858.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • The Keyes Co. v. Fla. Nursing Corp., 340 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
    …ht to withdraw the subject property at any time prior to consummation of a sale without incurring liability to the Plaintiff for a broker’s commission. Curran & Mac Donnell v. Pearre, 212 [202] So. 2d 858 (1st D.C.A. Fla., 1967); Fenton v. Teichman, 277 So. 2d 562 (3rd D.C.A. Fla., 1973); affirming Summary Judgment in Dade Circuit Case No. 72-12583; and Warter v. Bancroft Hotel Associates, Inc., 285 So. 2d 676 (3rd D.C.A. Fla., 1973). Also generally Hanover Realty Inc. v. Codomo, 95 So. 2d 420 (Fla., 1957).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw