MARY LEE VECCIARELLI, AS WIDOW, AND SURVIVING SPOUSE OF RICHARD VECCIARELLI, DECEASED, AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF RICHARD VECCIARELLI, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
JOHNSON FORD, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1973-05-29
No. 73-370
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
277 So. 2d 807 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1973) Caution
Cited by 17 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, Fla, 1962, 143 So.2d 849.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Jones v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 463 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 1985)
    …e wagon not been tied to Davis’ dog, no injury would have been inflicted because the dog did not come in contact with Donnie. Nor was the dog found to have taken any affirmative or aggressive action toward Donnie. Id. at 772 (citing Rutland v. Biel, 277 So. 2d 807, 809 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973), and Smith v. Allison). The district court concluded that Donnie’s injury was not the result of the risk created by dog ownership, and held that section 767.01 did not apply to create strict owner liability. The district cou…
  • Smith v. Allison, 332 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
    …96 So. 2d 227, 66 A.L.R.2d 912; Knapp v. Ball, Fla.App.1965, 175 So. 2d 808; Brandeis v. Felcher, Fla.App.1968, 211 So. 2d 606; English v. Seachord, Fla.App. 1971, 243 So. 2d 193, cert. dis., Fla.1972, 259 So. 2d 136; Rutland v. Biel, Fla.App.1973, 277 So. 2d 807. The statute so construed makes the obligations and duties of dogowners virtually those of insurers with regard to injuries caused by dogs, whether by biting or otherwise. There is no doubt that these cases authorize the imposition of the statutory…
    1 / 2
  • Allstate Ins. Co. v. Greenstein, 308 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
    …ld that no reversible error was committed, and the judgment accordingly is affirmed. We see little difficulty in upholding the trial court’s conclusion that Section 767.01 applies to this case. Appellants’ reliance on Rutland v. Biel, Fla.App.1973, 277 So. 2d 807, is not justified in the case at bar. In that decision, the Second District Court of Appeal held that 767.01 is inapplicable where the dog takes no affirmative or aggressive action toward the injured person. While we might agree with the court on t…

Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw