JON B. RIVERA AND UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
RICHARD WEINFELD, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed summary judgment against the driver for simple negligence in a guest passenger collision case, holding that the repeal of Florida's guest statute made the action maintainable on simple negligence rather than requiring gross negligence.
Summary judgment for simple negligence is proper when a driver fails to observe a red traffic light and collides with a vehicle lawfully entering the intersection, following repeal of the guest statute.
[1] Repeal of Florida's guest statute eliminates the requirement to prove gross negligence and permits recovery based on simple negligence in actions by guest passengers agai…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA guest passenger was injured when the driver Rivera failed to observe a red traffic light and entered an intersection, colliding with another vehicle…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Guest Statute cases and more on FLexlaw
The appellee, plaintiff below, was a guest passenger in an automobile operated by the appellant Jon B. Rivera, which was involved in a collision with another automobile at an intersection. Seeking damages for personal injuries received therein, the appellee filed an action against the driver Rivera and his insurer, charging Rivera with gross negligence, and against the driver of the other vehicle. On motion of the plaintiff the court granted a summary judgment on liability against Rivera and his insurer, who then appealed.
From the evidence before the court at the hearing on the motion for summary judgment it appeared beyond issue that upon nearing the intersection the driver Rivera did not observe the controlling traffic light until just before entering the intersection, at which time he saw the light facing him was red; that he was unable to prevent his car from entering the intersection, where it collided with the other vehicle which had entered the intersection from his right, properly on a green light.
Appellants argue the court committed error by holding that Rivera was guilty of gross negligence as a matter of law. We affirm the judgment. The guest statute (§ 320.59 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.) had been repealed in February of 1972, by Chapter 72-1. By reason thereof the plaintiff’s action against the driver Rivera was maintainable on simple negligence. See Inger-son v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Fla.App. 1973, 272 So.2d 862. The summary judgment was proper, as related to simple negligence of the driver Rivera.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ingerson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 272 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)