ROBERT N. THOMPSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Grand Larceny cases and more on FLexlaw
This appeal is by the defendant below from conviction following trial before the court without a jury, of the charged offenses of breaking and entering a dwelling with intent to commit a felony, to-wit: grand larceny, and grand larceny. The appellant contends the trial court committed error by denying his motions for acquittal made at the close of the state’s case and again at the close of the presentation of all of the evidence. In support thereof appellant argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction. We have examined the record and considered the briefs and conclude that the contention is without merit. There was competent substantial evidence to support the judgment of conviction, as to the commission of the offenses and as to identity of the appellant as one of the perpetrators thereof.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Finney v. State, 502 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…, 395 So. 2d 170 (Fla.1981); State v. Counce, 392 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Thomas v. State, 374 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 1979); Clements v. State, 340 So. 2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Comer v. State, 318 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Pons v. State, 278 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973); State v. Gillespie, 227 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969). Therefore we find no merit to the appeal from the adjudication upon the jury’s verdict. As to the appeal seeking review of the denial of the 3.850 motion, we find no merit…
-
Finley v. State, 325 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Estep v. State, 318 So. 2d 520 (Fla.App. 1st, 1975); and Pons v. State, 278 So. 2d 336 (Fla.App. 1st, 1973). RAWLS, Acting C. J., and MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.…
-
Dyal v. State, 386 So. 2d 868 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)…f the other foreseeable combinations. What matters is that the confinement is in a state, county, or municipal institution. Dyal was admittedly confined in the Nassau County Jail and was therefore confined in a county institution. In Pons v. State, 278 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973), the defendant was charged with escaping from the “lawful custody of the Sheriff of Alachua County,” but the proof showed that he escaped from the municipal jail of Gainesville. He urged on appeal that his conviction should be re…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence