ROBERT L. ADAMS, III, PETITIONER,
v.
TED POWERS, DIRECTOR AND GENERAL MANAGER, TIN PAN ALLEY, INC., RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Affidavit Of Insolvency cases and more on FLexlaw
The motion of movant, Robert L. Adams, III, to proceed in forma pauperis upon a petition for writ of replevin, must be denied for failure to comply with the provisions of Fla.Stat. § 57.081, F.S.A.
Said motion to proceed being denied, this Court is without authority to consider said petition for writ of replevin.
This order is issued without prejudice against movant to proceed in the Court of appropriate jurisdiction for certification of insolvency in the manner required by Fla. Stat. § 57.081, F.S.A., for proceedings in forma pauperis. Such certification can be obtained from the clerk in each action only upon affidavit of insolvency which is supported by a written certificate signed by a a member of The Florida Bar of the county thát he has investigated the applicant’s affidavit and found it to be true, and has investigated the applicant’s claim and believes it to be meritorious as a matter of law.
It is so ordered.
CARLTON, C. J., and BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fid. & Cas. Co. OF NEW York v. Fonseca, 358 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)…icle which Mrs. Rojas potentially could use on a regular basis, and that, as a matter of law, the clear language of the policy excludes liability on the facts before us. Boyd v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, supra; LaViolette v. Sapp, 278 So. 2d 598 (Fla.1973). Case number 77 — 1688 is affirmed. Case number 77-619 is reversed with directions to enter an order granting summary judgment for appellant therein, Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York. . Under the PIP provisions of the policy, t…
-
LEE v. City OF Winter Haven, 386 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)…smissed. GRIMES, C. J., and RYDER and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur. . The judicial officers of this court stand before the electors of each county within this district for retention to office. . 361 So. 2d 715 (Fla. 4 DCA 1978). See also Adams v. Powers, 278 So. 2d 598 (Fla.1973). . 375 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 4 DCA 1979). . Ch. 29615, Laws of Fla. (1955). See also note, “Proceedings in Forma Pauperis,” Vol. IX, University of Fla.Law Review, 65 at 72 (1956). . Ch. 57-251, § 58.09, Laws of Fla. The title to this act me…
-
S.C. Ins. Co. v. Heuer, 402 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)…of the policy here involved, whenever a family residing together in the same household owned more than one vehicle, it would be necessary to insure only one in order to have coverage on all. We do not accept this contention. See, LaViolette v. Sapp, 278 So. 2d 598 (Fla.1973). Quite clearly, exclusionary provisions of a policy limit coverage. As long as the exclusions are clear and unambiguous, an insurer will not be held to cover risks which it specifically rejected. New Hampshire Insurance Company v. Carter…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence