JOHNNY WILLIAMS, JR., PETITIONER,
v.
LOUIS L. WAINWRIGHT, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the evidence presented was insufficient to support a charge of breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny.
Petitioner was convicted of breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny. His attorney failed to file a timely appeal, but a belated revi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Breaking And Entering With Intent To Commit Grand Larceny cases and more on FLexlaw
Petitioner-defendant, Johnny Williams, Jr., was charged by information for breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony, to-wit: grand larceny, tried and convicted by a jury, adjudged guilty by the court with imposition of sentence. His appeal of the judgment and sentence was frustrated by the failure of his court-appointed attorney to timely file an appeal.
Nevertheless, we grant a belated review of the judgment and sentence to petitioner equivalent to a direct appeal by means of this habeas corpus proceeding. Henninger v. State, 230 So.2d 149 (Fla. 1970); Hollingshead v. Wainwright, 194 So.2d 577 (Fla.1967).
Upon a review and consideration of the record on appeal, the briefs and oral argument of counsel for the respective parties, we are of the opinion that when the state rested its case-in-chief, there was no evidence to support the charge of the information that when defendant broke and entered victim’s home, he had intent to commit grand larceny. On defendant’s motion, the charge should have been reduced to the lesser included offense of breaking arid entering with intent to commit petit larceny. Florida Statutes §§ 775.08, 810.01, *642811.021, F.S.A.; Rumph v. State, 248 So.2d 526 (Fla.App.1971).
Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the sentence vacated and set aside, and the cause remanded with directions to enter a judgment of conviction of the lesser included offense of breaking and entering with intent to commit petit larceny and imposition of sentence as the justice of the cause shall require.
Reversed and remanded, with directions.
CROSS and MAGER, JJ., and STRAWN, DAVID U., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Cleveland Hollingshead v. Louie L. Wainwright, 194 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 1967)
- Burton Goldberg v. The Ceco Corp., 230 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 1969)
- Rumph v. State, 248 So. 2d 526 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)