STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN WESLEY MIMS, APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
JOHN WESLEY MIMS, APPELLEE
278 So. 2d 659
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the orders of the lower court appealed from herein^are affirmed.
CARROLL, DONALD K, Acting C. J., and RAWLS and WIGGINTON, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Irvine v. Duval Cnty. Planning Comm'n & the City Of Jacksonville, 466 So. 2d 357 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)…387 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973). Accord, e.g., Hickey v. Wells, 91 So. 2d 206 (Fla.1957); Laney v. Holbrook, 8 So. 2d 465, 467 (Fla.1942); Harvey v. Nuzum, 345 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Edwards v. Division of Beverage, Board of Business Regulations, 278 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973); McCulley Ford, Inc. v. Calvin, 308 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Ford v. Bay County School Board, 246 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Powell v. Board of Public Instruction of Levy County, 229 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Po…
-
Harvey v. Nuzum, 345 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)…h essential requirements of law.” Such action of the division fails to comport with the requirements of due process, the Administrative Procedure Act and Florida case law, and, as such, is fatally defective. See also Edwards v. Division of Beverage, 278 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973). Although remand with instructions requiring a more specific order is customary in cases in which an agency fails to comply with the provisions of Section 120.-57(l)(b)(9), Florida Statutes, a review of the record in the instant…