W. RADFORD BELL
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a robbery conviction, finding no reversible error in the record after reviewing the defendant's ten propounded questions.
No reversible error was disclosed by the record.
“We have carefully considered the record in the light of the questions propounded and find that no useful purpose can be served by the writing of an opinion.”
This quote establishes the court's review process and its decision not to issue a detailed opinion.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe defendant was charged with robbery without a deadly weapon and subsequently convicted. He appealed this conviction to the Florida Supreme Court, r…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Under information charging the defendant with robbery while not then and there being armed with a deadly weapon, the defendant was convicted and has perfected his appeal from such conviction to this Court.
The appellant has propounded in his brief ten (10) questions for our consideration.
We have carefully considered the record in the light of the questions propounded and find that no useful purpose can be served by the writing of an opinion. No reversible error is disclosed by the record.
The judgment should be affirmed and it is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J-. J., concur.
Chapman, J., concurs in opinion and judgment.
Justices Whitfield and Brown not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.