CHARLES HENRY MANN MOSES, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
JOAN HAMMERUM MOSES, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1973-06-27
No. 72-700
REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.
279 So. 2d 370 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and having considered the briefs of the parties we are of the opinion that the final judgment should be affirmed based upon the appellant’s failure to demonstrate reversible error; except that that portion of the final judgment requiring appellant to maintain insurance on his life for the benefit of his former wife and to make her an irrevocable beneficiary is erroneous. See Putman v. Putman, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 717.

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed in all respects except as heretofore noted and the cause remanded to the chancellor for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Sampson, 317 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
    …urt, the judgment was affirmed. See Sampson v. State, Fla.App.1972, 268 So. 2d 467. He was awarded a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. This last order was appealed to this court and affirmed. See State v. Sampson, Fla.App.1973, 279 So. 2d 370. Upon the expiration of 109 days from the order awarding a new trial and 79 days after the filing of the mandate of this court affirming that order, the defendant filed his motion for discharge.2 [*783] The ground alleged for the motion for discharg…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw