MAZEL & BROCHE, INC., APPELLANT,

v.

FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF MIAMI, AND BETTY WOOLFE, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• McALLISTER v. McALLISTER, 345 So. 2d 352 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)
  …d of reasonable permanent periodic alimony does not forever enslave the husband, because significantly changed circumstances, either his or hers, are well settled in the law as a basis for later modification thereof. As was said in Wilson v. Wilson, 279 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973), “Nil prospects to the contrary notwithstanding, if she should somehow blossom into a financially productive member of society and other material changes occur, the husband can obtain a trial court review of the award”. We there…
• Colucci v. Colucci, 392 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …anged circumstances before there can be a modification. If she is entitled to permanent alimony it should be awarded now. Later, if the husband can show changed circumstances, either his or hers, he may be entitled to modification. Wilson v. Wilson, 279 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). In accord, for example, are our decisions in Smith v. Smith, supra, McNaughton v. McNaughton, supra, and Gratton v. Gratton, supra. For these reasons, the award of $1,000 per month in periodic alimony shall, upon remand, be mad…
• Pastore v. Pastore, 497 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 1986)
  …of majority in four years, at which point it will be sold. The husband’s exclusive bearing of the financial burden of the home is therefore not imposed without limit, and may be seen as a form of rehabilitative alimony. As noted in Wilson v. Wilson, 279 So. 2d 893, 894 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 285 So. 2d 19 (Fla.1973), “[b]y operation of law, upon divorce, the parties to property held as an estate by the entireties become tenants in common. Notwithstanding, however, upon ... proper and sufficient proof,…

Authorities Cited

• Seaboard All-Florida Railway v. Florabel Levitt, 105 Fla. 600 (Fla. 1932)
• Invs. Syndicate OF Am., Inc. v. Dade Cnty., 98 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 3d DCA 1957)