CLAYTON ADAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
J. G. WHITFIELD ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 1973-07-10
No. S-51
RAWLS, C. J., and SPECTOR and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
280 So. 2d 8 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-plaintiff brings this appeal from that portion of a post trial order and final judgment setting aside a jury verdict awarding him punitive damages in the amount of $7,500.00 in a malicious prosecution action. Appellees-defendants cross-appealed the final judgment in favor of *9appellant for compensatory damages in the amount of $12,000.00.

After reviewing the record and transcript of the trial, it is the opinion of this Court that the trial judge was correct in setting aside punitive damages as awarded by the jury. However, we hold that the jury verdict as to compensatory damages is appropriate.

The judgment appealed is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and SPECTOR and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Adams v. Whitfield, 290 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 1974)
    …CARLTON, Chief Justice: Petitioner seeks certiorari review of a decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, reported at 280 So. 2d 8, which conflicts with Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. et al. v. Archer et al., 126 Fla. 308, 171 So. 214 (1936); City of Hollywood v. Coley, 258 So. 2d 828 (4th DCA Fla.1971), and Wrains v. Rose, 175 So. 2d 75 (2d DCA Fla.1965). Although the opinion sough…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw