KEN E. BASSO ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1973-06-12
Nos. R-197, R-198 and R-199
CARROLL, DONALD K, Acting C. J, and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ, concur.
280 So. 2d 25 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

These causes having been orally argued before the Court the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the orders of the lower court appealed from herein are affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K, Acting C. J, and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Bryan, 290 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 1974)
    …DEKLE, Justice. This cause comes to us on petition for writ of certiorari, asserting direct conflict between the decision below at 280 So. 2d 25 (Fla.App.1st 1973), and Lee v. State, 239 So. 2d 136 (Fla.App.1st 1970). Conflict exists and we have jurisdiction pursuant to Art. V, § 3(b) (3), Fla.Const., F.S.A. Respondent was tried on a charge of 2nd degree murder. Testimony as to some of the…
  • Bryan v. Louie L. Wainwright, 511 F.2d 644 (5th Cir. 1975)
    …ermissibly coercive met with mixed acceptance but ultimate failure. On direct appeal, the Florida First District Court of Appeal reversed the conviction and remanded the case for a new trial because of the giving of the Allen charge. Bryan v. State, 280 So. 2d 25 (Fla.App.1973). Two members of the three-judge appellate panel stated that, while the Allen charge was not impermissible per se, in this case the charge, coupled with the subsequent instruction setting a twenty minute period for deliberation, consti…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw