DONALD LEE HIERS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DONALD LEE HIERS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
280 So. 2d 454
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the trial court hereby appealed is affirmed.
SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bright v. State, 317 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)…not to gamble on proving her innocence. This she had a right to do. Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970); North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970); Laird v. State, Fla.App.1973, 280 So. 2d 454; Scarborough v. State, Fla.App.1973, 278 So. 2d 657. The real problem in this case is that the trial judge did not comply with Rule 3.170(j) RCrP; he did not determine that there was a factual basis for the plea of guilty. However, based upon the f…
-
Theotis Hunt v. State, 306 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)…lity of a lesser penalty, rather than face a wide range of possibilities extending from acquittal to conviction and possibly a higher penalty. See Brady v. United States, supra; North Carolina v. Alford, supra, and Laird v. State, Fla.App.1st, 1973, 280 So. 2d 454. Upon consideration of the complete record, briefs and argument of counsel, we find that the ruling of the trial judge was proper and, therefore, we do not disturb it. We have examined the other point raised on appeal by appellant and find it to be…