WILLIAM HENRY DRAYTON, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Quinn v. Truman Alan Millard, 358 So. 2d 1378 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …ain a copy of the policy itself. Therefore we direct that, on remand, the trial court shall verify the policy limits and incorporate its finding on this point to govern a modification of the judgment against Allstate and Quinn. See Stella v. Craine, 281 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). And cf. Williams v. Banning, 259 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972) (where an insured contests his policy limits and no proof of those limits is in evidence, the filing of a cross claim is the proper procedure). The court shall then…
• Ward W. Kelly v. Williams, 411 So. 2d 902 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
  …s potential liability for bad faith negotiations. See, e.g., Allstate Ins. Co. v. Shilling, 374 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Quinn v. Millard, 358 So. 2d 1378 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); Soler v. Kukula, 297 So. 2d 600 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); Stella v. Craine, 281 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973), cert. denied, 289 So. 2d 731 (Fla.1974). However, where allegations of bad faith negotiations exist, the Third District Court has required the insurance company to file a Williams cross-claim, and thus has impliedly allowed the…
• Soler v. Kukula, 297 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
  …nt was a copy of the subject insurance policy and affidavit of defendant’s claims manager. Thus, we hold the trial judge was correct in limiting defendant insurer’s liability to $10,000, the limits of the policy. See Stella v. Craine, Fla.App. 1973, 281 So. 2d 584. On cross-appeal, cross-appellants contend the court erred in denying defense counsel access to the investigative report and personal notes and records of Officer James for the purpose of cross-examination after the officer had testified from these…