IN THE INTEREST OF BABY BOY H., A DEPENDENT CHILD

Fla. 2d DCA | 1973-08-29
No. 73-464
HOBSON, A. C. J., and McNULTY and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
281 So. 2d 589 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

*590PER CURIAM.

We have considered the record and briefs and determine that there was sufficient, competent evidence to support the finding of the trial court “. . . that it is manifestly to the best interest of said child that he be permanently committed to the Catholic Social Services of the St. Petersburg Diocese, Inc., for subsequent adoption. ...” Appellee having failed to demonstrate reversible error or show that the trial court abused its discretion, the order appealed is hereby

Affirmed.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and McNULTY and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • In the Interest of Baby BOY S. v. State, 349 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)
    …lfare, is without merit. A finding that it would be in the best interest of the child that he be permanently committed to a licensed child-placement agency, if supported by substantial, competent evidence, is all that is required. In re Baby Boy H., 281 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). However, reversal is required for another reason. Appellant was entitled to an opportunity to review the report filed by Catholic Service Bureau and to introduce evidence in rebuttal. The failure of the trial court to apprise hi…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw