SAMUEL T. SAPIRO, APPELLANT,
v.
LEONARD L. LEVENSTEIN, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Vacating Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
ORDER ON MANDATE
Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on July 25, 1972 (266 So.2d 40) reversing the final judgment of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and
Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed June 20, 1973 (279 So.2d 858) and mandate now lodged in this- court, quashed this court’s judgment with directions to reinstate the judgment of the circuit court;
Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore entered in this court on September 18, 1972 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed July 25, 1972 is vacated, the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the judgment of the circuit court herein appealed from is reinstated and affirmed. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bermil Corp. v. Sawyer, 353 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)…based on the above and even absent the allegation and proof of actual fraud, it was not error for a jury to pierce the corporate veil and find Leeds liable on an alter ego theory. See Levenstein v. Sapiro, 279 So. 2d 858 (Fla.1973), conformed to at 282 So. 2d 11 (Fla.3d DCA 1973). As for Norman Morris, however, the partner of Leeds, it is our opinion that the record will neither factually nor legally support his individual liability on the usurious transaction. As was previously mentioned, Morris was broug…
Authorities Cited
- Levenstein v. Sapiro, 279 So. 2d 858 (Fla. 1973)
- Sapiro v. Levenstein, 266 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)