IDA L. HACKNEY, A WIDOW, APPELLANT,
v.
ROSCOE J. HACKNEY, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1941-01-14
Terrell, C. J., Buford, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur., Justices Whitfield, Brown and Chapman not partipating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.
145 Fla. 470 Florida Supreme Court (1941) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 199 So. 755
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

From a study of the file in the above case, no reversible error has appeared, therefore, the decree of the chancellor is—

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Buford, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur.

Justices Whitfield, Brown and Chapman not partipating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Ruffie Lundon v. Chapman, 151 Fla. 336 (Fla. 1942)
    …he petition set up no grounds which are available on habeas corpus. The allegations contained in these paragraphs involve issues which were tried and determined on the original trial, judgment in which was affirmed by this Court in Lundon v. State, 145 Fla. 470, 199 Sou. 755. The same questions were again presented to this Court by petition, which was denied by us on September 17,1942, wherein it was prayed that this Court grant petitioner leave to apply to the trial court for writ of error coram nobis. T…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw