WALTER REESE WESLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WALTER REESE WESLEY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
282 So. 2d 652
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
Appellant seeks reversal of the Order denying his post-conviction motion to vacate judgment and sentence. This Court has previously affirmed his judgment of conviction and sentence for the offense of rape. Wesley v. State, 239 So.2d 124 (Fla.App.1st, 1970).
We have given full consideration to the record and briefs of the parties. It appearing therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that prejudicial error was committed in the proceedings below, the Order appealed herein is AFFIRMED.
WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sec. Mut. Cas. Co. v. Pacura, 402 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…idual bringing suit or to a class of persons to which he claims to belong as a third party beneficiary. Wright v. Terry, 23 Fla. 160, 2 So. 6 (1887); McCann Plumbing Co. v. Plumbing Industry Program, 105 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958); Bryant v. Cole, 282 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973); Mulligan v. Wallace, 349 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Florida has also recognized the right of a third party beneficiary to bring an action directly against an insurer to recover under contractual provisions of medical payment…
-
Clearwater KEY Association-South Beach, Inc. v. Thacker, 431 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)…such, the Thackers were mere incidental beneficiaries, not intended beneficiaries. See American Surety Co. of New York v. Smith, 100 Fla. 1012, 130 So. 440 (1930). In Florida, an incidental beneficiary cannot sue on a contract. Id.; Bryant v. Cole, 282 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). Alternatively, the Thackers maintain that their “right” to pay only one monthly management fee arose independent of the original management agreement by virtue of the language in the sales contract for Unit 408 and the represent…
-
Elissa Landi Paparone v. Bankers Life & Cas. Co., 496 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)…icipation agreement. That agreement contains no indication that it was made for the benefit of Paparone. A third party who benefits only incidentally or indirectly by the existence of a contract has no right to enforce that contract. Bryant v. Cole, 282 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). Thus, Bankers had no direct or indirect contractual duty to Paparone. Paparone also alleges that Bankers is liable for the intentional and unjustified interference with the contractual or business relationship between Paparone a…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Grover Cleveland Caldwell, Jr. v. State, 239 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970)