JUAN COLON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JUAN COLON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
283 So. 2d 127
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Defendant contends (and the State concedes) that the offenses charged under Counts 1 and 2 were facets or phases of the same criminal transaction for which a single sentence should have been imposed. Moody v. State, Fla.App.1973, 279 So. 2d 909; Lietch v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So. 2d 203. Accordingly, defendant’s convictions are affirmed but sentences on Counts 1 and 2 are vacated and the cause remanded with directions that defendant be resentenced in accordance with this opinion.
OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Martin v. Bonner, 292 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 1974)…Certiorari denied. 283 So. 2d 127. ADKINS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Lietch v. State, 248 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)
- Black v. State, 279 So. 2d 909 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
- Del Moody v. State, 279 So. 2d 909 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973)