JOHN MICHAEL SMITH, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Jones, 327 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 1976)
  …such part thereof as the court should determine. . . . ” 286 So. 2d at 246-47. The other District Courts of Appeal have not been as restrictive and have attempted to distinguish that Williams decision. The Second District, in Washington v. State, 284 So. 2d 236 (Fla.App.2d 1973), had before it a defendant who had pleaded guilty to a felony and was placed on four years probation, conditioned on his spending one year in jail. The defendant left the jail without permission, which resulted in the trial court’s…
• Donley v. State, 557 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
  …n hearing does not have to meet the strict requirements of a criminal trial. It is sufficient if the appellant is advised of the charges, evidence is presented, and the probationer has an opportunity to present his position. See Washington v. State, 284 So. 2d 236 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973); McNeely v. State, 186 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966). In this case, the appellant was represented by counsel, who admitted the charges, and represented to the court that the state had offered a maximum sentence of four years if th…
• Allen v. State, 662 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
  …court thereafter sentenced him without further inquiry. Appellant’s argument, that the trial court erred in not inquiring as to whether his plea of guilty to violating probation was freely and voluntarily given, was rejected in Washington v. State, 284 So. 2d 236 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). After noting that the strict requirements of guilty pleas in original criminal proceedings were established in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969), Judge Grimes explained: Section 948.06, Florid…

Authorities Cited

• Steinhauser v. State, 228 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)