CORNELL SYKES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1973-11-07
No. 72-826
MANN, C. J., and McNULTY and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
284 So. 2d 706 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1973)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of the post-conviction motion.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was convicted of assault and murder, and his direct appeal was affirmed. He later filed a pro se post-conviction motion which was summarily …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Cornell Sykes, timely appeals from an order entered by the trial court summarily denying a post-conviction motion brought under RCrP 3.850, 33 F.S.A. and filed by appellant pro se.

Appellant was charged by a two-count information with the offense of assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree and murder in the second dergee. He pled not guilty, was tried by jury, convicted and sentenced to a term in the state penitentiary. He filed a direct appeal and this court in Sykes v. State, Fla.App.1969, 221 So. 2d 216, affirmed.

We have reviewed the record before us, considered the points raised on the appeal by appellant, and find each of them to be without merit, being based on appellant’s unsubstantiated bare allegations, without more. Further, each of said points were either raised or should have been presented on the direct appeal. See rationale of Davis v. State, Fla.App.1973, 277 So. 2d 790. The record clearly does not support the contention of appellant that he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing.

Appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, we, accordingly,

Affirm.

MANN, C. J., and McNULTY and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw