CENTRAL TRUCK LINES, INC., PETITIONER,

v.

WILLIAM H. BEVIS ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Carter v. State, 410 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …he Court to read the deposition. The record indicates that defense counsel’s efforts to obtain the witness occurred the day before trial. This case is distinguishable from the situation in State v. Barnes, 280 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 285 So. 2d 25 (Fla.1973), in which the court permitted the use of a deposition “where the state has the right to cross-examine” if the witness is “unavailable for good cause or has died.” In the case before us, there is no evidence the witness had died or was una…
• State v. Leonard, 376 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …transmitter. We hold that under these circumstances the above evidence was admissable for the purpose of authenticating Garcia’s consent. See 13 Fla.Jur. Evidence § 341 (1957) and Cf. State v. Barnes, 280 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973), cert. denied 285 So. 2d 25 (Fla.1973). Accordingly, we reverse that part of the order suppressing the tape recordings of the conversation between Garcia and Leonard. For the reasons stated those portions of the pretrial order appealed herein are reversed and the cause reman…