HARRY ALEXANDER SHISHMAN, A/K/A HARRY ALEXANDER MANIAN, APPELLANT,

v.

GUNILLA SHISHMAN, A/K/A GUNILLA MANIAN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Bystrom v. Valencia Ctr., Inc., 432 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …sent market values reflecting future potential uses indicate “just value,” and are therefore good evidence for assessment purposes. Williams v. Simpson, supra, was cited with approval by this Court in Dade County v. The Miami Herald Publishing Co., 285 So. 2d 671 (Fla.App.1973). After defining “fair market value” the Court added (at p. 673): ... This court has previously held that testimony of potential future use is speculative and conjectural and incompentent as proof of fair market value. Bal Harbour Clu…
• W.R. (Ray) Daniel, Jr. v. Canterbury Towers, Inc., 462 So. 2d 497 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
  …t go to make up the intrinsic value of the property. Hillsborough County v. Knight & Wall Co., 153 Fla. 346, 14 So. 2d 703 (1943); Calder Race Course, Inc. v. Overstreet, 363 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Dade County v. Miami Herald Publishing Co., 285 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). While a property appraiser must consider each of the factors set out in section 193.011, he is free to assign to each factor such weight as he deems proper. Even where each of several different factors might be proper, the selec…
• Atl. Int'l Inv. Corp. v. Turner, 383 So. 2d 919 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
  …Fla.1974); Blake v. Farrand Corp., Inc., 321 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Walker v. Connolly, 299 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Hill v. Coplan Pipe & Supply Co., Inc., 296 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Dade County v. Miami Herald Publishing Co., 285 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Alter v. Finesmith, 214 So. 2d 732 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968). Reversal may also be necessary if the property assessor failed to consider one of the elements required by Section 193.011. Straughn v. Tuck, 354 So. 2d 368.(Fla.1977). Sect…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Thoburn Stamm, Jr. v. Stamm, 266 So. 2d 413 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)