CURTIS ROBINSON EXCAVATING, EMPLOYER, AND THE HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP, WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE CARRIER, PETITIONERS,

v.

FELIX OLMOS, EMPLOYEE, AND THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• The RED Carpet Corp. OF Panama City Beach v. Calvert Fire Ins. Co., 393 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
  …has long been recognized that the testimony of qualified experts is helpful, if not necessary, in cases presenting questions of fact not within the ordinary experience of the jury. For example, in Aetna Insurance Company v. Loxahatchee Marina, Inc., 286 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970), a case also involving the testimony of an insurance expert, the Fourth District Court of Appeal noted: The purpose of an expert witness is to aid the trier of fact in the quest for truth in those areas which are not of common k…
• Computer Scis., Inc. v. Hendricks, 382 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)
  …from work for reasons other than his injury, and was not working because work was unavailable. The award of temporary total and temporary partial disability benefits is therefore reversed. Curtis Robinson v. Olmos, 8 F.C.R. 131 (1973), cert. denied, 286 So. 2d 12 (Fla.1973); North American Rockwell v. Filliben, I.R.C. 2-2831 (1975); Norton v. Supreme Aluminum Products, Inc., 8 F.C.R. 6 (1973), cert. denied, 279 So,2d 873 (Fla.1973). As to point 7, we find no evidence in the record to support the award of co…