THE CITY OF ORMOND BEACH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

BELLEMEAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Curtin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 449 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)
  …m under the Curtin policies: all family-owned vehicles which are insured under other policies. Such exceptions from coverage have been uniformly rejected or denied by the courts. See Hines; Boulnois v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 286 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973), cert. denied, 294 So. 2d 658 (Fla.1974); Hartford Accident & Indemnty Company v. Mason, 210 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968). The only break in the phalanx of cases requiring that uninsured motorist coverage parallel the theoretic…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. Fonck, 344 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)
  …n such an instance where the owner’s coverage may not be available to the injured party, that party would have slight comfort in knowing that the negligent thief was operating an insured vehicle. See also Boulnois v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co., 286 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). Nevertheless, we hold that the coverage was not available under the Hartford policy. Since Fonck was an insured under the Hartford coverage solely by reason of his status as an employee, he was not entitled to a recovery under…
• Taylor v. Safeco Ins. Co., 298 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
  …oes not extend to appellant’s decedent as he is not a person legally entitled to recover damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured motor vehicle. Appellant also relies upon Boulnois v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Fla.App. (4th), 286 So. 2d 264, in support of her contention. There, Boulnois driving his motorcycle on which he had uninsured motor vehicle coverage was struck by an automobile on which the owner had no insurance. The employer of the driver of the automobile had insurance and th…