EDD SHEDD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1973-11-27
No. T-174
WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., SPECTOR, J., and CREWS, JOHN J., Associate Judge, concur.
286 So. 2d 593 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., SPECTOR, J., and CREWS, JOHN J., Associate Judge, concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Shands Teaching Hosp. & Clinics, Inc. v. Mercury Ins. Co. OF Fla., 97 So. 3d 204 (Fla. 2012)
    …d subjects. Because section 11(a) forbids only the Legislature from enacting certain special laws and general laws of local application, a county ordinance cannot violate that provision of the Florida Constitution. See Brooks v. Town of Orange Park, 286 So. 2d 593, 596 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973) (“[T]he special or general laws of local application referred to in [a provision of article III, section 11(a) ] apply to laws enacted by the state legislature and not to ordinances [*212] adopted by the various municipaliti…
  • Edd Shedd v. State, 295 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 1974)
    …Certiorari denied. 286 So. 2d 593. ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents with opinion m which McCAIN, J., concurs. OVERTON, J., dissents.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw