BOBBY JOE TAYLOR, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1973-12-18
No. 73-485
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
287 So. 2d 128 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, defendant m the trial court, seeks review of a judgment and sentence of twenty years imprisonment for breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and aggravated battery.

Appellant’s first point on appeal challenges the introduction into evidence of a photograph and testimony concerning the victim’s injuries. We find this point to lack substantial merit. See Grant v. State, Fla.1965, 171 So. 2d 361; Belger v. State, Fla.App.1965, 171 So. 2d 574.

Appellant next questions the legality of his arrest and certain extra-judicial statements he made thereafter. In his motion to suppress before the trial court and at a hearing before the trial judge, appellant never objected to his arrest upon the ground that it was illegal. We may not now consider this point for the first time on appeal. See Shea v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 167 So. 2d 767; Griffin v. State, Fla.App.1969, 217 So. 2d 893; Gil v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 266 So. 2d 43.

Therefore, for the reasons stated, the judgment and sentence appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Taylor v. State, 294 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 1974)
    …Certiorari denied. 287 So. 2d 128. ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and McCAIN, JJ., concur. DEKLE, J., dissents.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw