VERNON PITTMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1973-10-16
No. 72-253
Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
287 So. 2d 337 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was indicted for murder in the first degree. On trial by the court, following waiver of jury trial, he was found guilty of murder in the second degree, and sentenced to imprisonment therefor. The arguments for reversal presented by the appellant have been considered in the light of the record and briefs and are found to be without merit. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the judgment. The appellant’s challenge to the legality of the grand jury by which he was indicted was untimely, raised first on appeal. See § 905.05 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Yates v. State, 43 Fla. 177, 29 So. 965; Frazier v. State, Fla.1958, 107 So. 2d 16. Compare State v. Silva, Fla.1972, 259 So. 2d 153, 158. The inculpatory statement of the defendant was properly admitted.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Mohr v. Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd., 294 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 1974)
    …Certiorari denied. 287 So. 2d 337. ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, DEKLE and OVERTON, JJ., concur. ERVIN and McCAIN, JJ., dissent.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw