IN RE RULE 6.13, FLORIDA TRAFFIC COURT RULES

Fla. | 1974-01-16
No. 44862
CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, TJ., concur.
287 So. 2d 677 Florida Supreme Court (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court amended Rule 6.13 of the Florida Traffic Court Rules to make Rule 3.191 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure applicable to traffic offenses.


Facts & Procedural History

The Traffic Court Review Committee requested an amendment to Rule 6.13 of the Florida Traffic Court Rules. The amendment makes the rules for criminal …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

At the request and suggestion of the Traffic Court Review Committee, Rule 6.-13, Florida Traffic Court Rule, is amended by adding thereto the following provisions:

RULE 6.13. PRACTICE AS IN CRIMINAL CASES

Rule 3.191, Rules of Criminal Procedure, shall be applicable to traffic offenses. A person .shall be considered '‘taken into custody” when he is arrested or when a traffic citation or notice to appear is served upon him.

This Rule shall be effective andw govern the trial dates of all persons taken into custody after 12:01 a. m., Daylight Savings Time, on February IS, 1974.

The trial of all persons taken into custody prior to the effective date of this Rule shall commence on or before May IS, 1974, unless a written demand for speedy trial is made. Upon such demand trial shall commence within sixty days from service of such demand upon the prosecuting attorney.

In all other respects the Florida Traffic Court Rules are ratified and confirmed.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, TJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. McCALL, 301 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 1974)
    …ncur. ERVIN, J., concurs to conclusion only of order dismissing the criminal charges against Appellee. ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, J., dissent. . Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. . In re: Rules 6.13, Florida Traffic Court Rules, 287 So. 2d 677 (Fla.1974). . Ser-Nestler, Inc. v. General Finance Loan Co., 167 So. 2d 230 (Fla.App.1964), appeal dismissed 174 So. 2d 35 (Fla.1965). . Id.…
  • Castaneda v. Honorable Lee C. Conser, 292 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)
    …e facts of this case, appellant was granted a speedy trial in the County Court within the requirements of Section 16, Article I, Constitution of Florida, F.S.A. (1968). Affirmed. MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur. . By opinion filed January 16, 1974, 287 So. 2d 677, the Supreme Court of Florida has further amended Rule 6.13, TrCR to provide in substance that as to all persons taken into custody after 12:01 A.M. daylight savings time, February 15, 1974 (the effective date of the amendment), Rules of Criminal Pr…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw