FRED BENSON, APPELLANT,
v.
RUTH NEWTON, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1974-01-18
No. 72-985
MANN, C. J., BOARDMAN, J., and COWART, JOE A., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
288 So. 2d 295 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon careful consideration of the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel we affirm on the authority of Meyer v. Law, Fla., 287 So. 2d 37, reh. den. December 12, 1973 (Florida Supreme Court Case No. 42,788, 287 So. 2d 37, opinion filed July 5, 1973).

MANN, C. J., BOARDMAN, J., and COWART, JOE A., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Wilt v. State, 410 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
    …cts in this case as shown by the overwhelming evidence1 of the defendant’s guilt, it would appear that the harmless error doctrine should be considered and the conviction and sentence of second degree murder should be affirmed. See: Gordon v. State, 288 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Hamilton v. State, 356 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Keel v. State, 243 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Clark v. State, 378 So. 2d 1315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); United States v. Mayo, 646 F. 2d 369 (9th Cir. 1980). . One witness a…
  • Hamilton v. State, 356 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
    …nd robbery was not admissible, the error would be harmless in view of the overwhelming eyewitness testimony identifying Hamilton as the perpetrator of the instant robbery. See Keel v. State, 243 [*31] So. 2d 630 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971); Gordan v. State, 288 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). Affirmed.…
  • Morejon v. State, 394 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
    …ter. The testimony was offered, not to show the defendant’s bad character or criminal propensities but, rather, to show the defendant’s state of mind at the time he committed the crimes. Williams v. State, 110 So. 2d 654 (Fla.1959); Gordan v. State, 288 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Blake v. State, 336 So. 2d 454 (Fla.3d DCA 1976). (3) There was no error in admitting testimony concerning the defendant’s “religious” beliefs and in denying a mistrial predicated thereon. The testimony of a witness to the effec…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw