RUSH PAULA ROEBUCK, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RUSH PAULA ROEBUCK, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
288 So. 2d 528
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1974)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Azcunce v. Est. OF Rene R. Azcunce, 586 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…It is well settled in Florida that, as a general rule, the execution of a codicil to a will has the effect of republishing the prior will as of the date of the codicil. Waterbury v. Munn, 159 Fla. 754, 32 So. 2d 603 (1947); In re Campbell’s Estate, 288 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 300 So. 2d 266 (Fla.1974). Although this is not an inflexible rule and must at times give way to a contrary intent of the testator, Waterbury; Massachusetts Audubon Soc’y, Inc. v. Ormond Village Improvement Ass’n, 152 Fl…
-
In re Est. of Robert H. Campbell. Elizabeth M. Campbell v. Barnett Bank OF Hollywood, 300 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 1974)…Certiorari denied. 288 So. 2d 528. ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN. and DEKLE, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1968)