WESLEY JAMES, APPELLANT,
v.
SHIRLEY JAMES, APPELLEE
MITCHELL, HENRY CLAY, Jr., Associate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Appellee’s motion to rehear and clarification of the opinion filed by this court.
The Appellee has posed the question as to whether the reversal of the judgment awarding alimony would apply to the provision in the final judgment that the husband pay the house payment including taxes and insurance. We find that the trial court’s order requiring the husband to pay the principal, interest, taxes and insurance premiums on the residence of the parties is in the nature of child support which was within the trial court’s discretion to award.
Therefore, the motion for clarification is granted as stated above. In addition, the motion for rehearing is denied.
MILLS, C. J., and ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gould v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 443 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)…if there has been no prejudice to the insurer. See Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co. v. Earnest, 378 So. 2d 787 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Where factual issues exist as to prejudice to the insurer, summary judgment is improper. Johnson v. Home Indemnity Co., 377 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). See also Holinda v. Title and Trust Co., 438 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 5th DCA). [*128] In Bass v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 199 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967), the Fourth District noted that when a “consent clause” in an uninsured m…
-
Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. Sutton, 400 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)…. Jones v. Travelers Indem. Co. of R. I., 368 So. 2d 1289 (Fla.1979). . See Travelers Ins. Co. v. Gray, 360 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Tuthill v. State Farm Ins. Co., 19 Ill.App.3d 491, 311 N.E. 2d 770 (1974). . See Johnson v. Home Indem. Co., 377 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); McInnis v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 208 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968); Kaplan v. Phoenix of Hartford Ins. Co., 215 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968). . Aristonico Infante v. Preferred Risk Mut. Ins. Co., 364 So. 2d 874 (Fla…
-
Scott v. Kirkland, 652 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…in fact judgment-proof was raised by Kirkland’s financial affidavit submitted by appellant in the proceedings below. When a factual issue is raised regarding prejudice to the insurer, summary judgment is inappropriate. Johnson v. Home Indemnity Co., 377 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). We, therefore, reverse on this issue and remand for proceedings in accordance with this opinion. ERVIN, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.…