RENE JAMES BRYANT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RENE JAMES BRYANT, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
377 So. 2d 208
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1979)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon considering the briefs and record in this case, we determine that the appeal must be dismissed. A defendant who pleads guilty may take a direct appeal only from rulings occurring contemporaneously with the plea and not from anything previous to the plea or subsequent thereto. Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla.1979).
ERVIN, Acting C. J., and BOOTH and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
Ryan v. State, 457 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)…re is evidence in the record from which the jury could infer the commission of another crime by the accused. Simmons v. State, 1939, 139 Fla. 645, 190 So. 756, 758. Ailer v. State, 114 So. 2d 348, 351 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959); see also Glassman v. State, 377 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Fitzgerald v. State, 227 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969). The statement concerning the numerous other drug drops at the ranch can certainly be interpreted as meaning appellant had knowledge of and perhaps participated in those illeg…
-
Jackson v. State, 421 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…3d DCA 1982); Kindell v. State, 413 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Harper v. State, supra; McMillian v. State, 409 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Ruiz v. State, supra; Porter v. State, 386 So. 2d 1209, 1213-14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Glassman v. State, 377 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). The volume of these cases — including multiple acts of misconduct by particular prosecutors3 — is so great that we can no longer believe that they represent merely isolated examples of understandable, if inexcusable, overzealousn…
-
Huff v. State, 437 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 1983)…them a responsibility that transcends the average experience and common knowledge of a juryman.” 114 So. 2d at 203. Second, the state attorney is prohibited from commenting on matters unsupported by the evidence produced at trial. Glassman v. State, 377 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). The trial record is totally devoid of any evidence to substantiate that the signature of N.R. Huff which appeared [*1091] on the guarantee agreement had been forged. The trial court had earlier denied appellant’s motion to suppre…
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gissendanner v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
- Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)