GERALD KILPATRICK, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Jaffee v. Jaffee, 394 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …ovided by the agreement, and therefore no basis for affirmance of the modification because of a change in the husband’s situation. Withers v. Withers, 390 So. 2d 453 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Osman v. Osman, 280 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), cert. denied, 289 So. 2d 6 (Fla.1973). . This ruling of course also negated any further cost of living increments provided by the agreement and judgment. . Despite its title, the agreement was merely a settlement of the wife’s claim for alimony and support. It did not provi…
• Wiedman v. Wiedman, 610 So. 2d 681 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)
  …1302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). See Desilets v. Desilets, 377 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Fried v. Fried, 375 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Bradley v. Bradley, 347 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Osman v. Osman, 280 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 289 So. 2d 6 (Fla.1973); Foster v. Foster, 537 S.W. 2d 833 (Mo.App.1976). See In re Marriage of Smith, 77 Ill.App.3d 858, 33 Ill.Dec. 332, 396 N.E. 2d 859 (1979). . Benz v. Benz, 355 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Norton v. Norton, 328 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 1st DCA…
• Fiesler v. Fiesler, 395 So. 2d 1261 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …d 274 (Fla.1954). Nor did he contend that he was financially unable to pay the tuition required by that school, so as perhaps to justify a modification of the agreement accordingly. See Osman v. Osman, 280 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), cert. denied, 289 So. 2d 6 (Fla.1973). Under these circumstances, he was bound by his clear, unambiguous and unqualified undertaking to pay the full amount of the bills in question. Jaffee v. Jaffee, 394 So. 2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (holding it improper to vary terms of prop…