JAMES G. DEMPSTER, APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLOTTE DEMPSTER, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1974-02-07
No. T-456
289 So. 2d 418 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Walker v. State, 384 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
    …niformly involved records where defense counsel presented something more than a bare or vague assertion of incompetency. See, e. g., Pedrero v. State, 262 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972), on remand 271 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973); Mitchell v. State, 289 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), on remand 311 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); Meeks v. State, 289 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Boggs v. State, 375 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). Support for this position can also be found in Federal decisions dealing with the…
  • Mitchell v. State, 311 So. 2d 181 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
    …BOARDMAN, Judge. In our original opinion filed in this case (Fla.App.2d, 1974, 289 So. 2d 418) we remanded the cause to the Circuit Court of Pinellas County (trial court) with directions to determine, according to RCrP 3.-210(a), whether appellant was mentally competent at the time of his trial. Subsequently, the trial court carried out our…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw