A. V. POTTER AND JOSEPHINE S. POTTER, HIS WIFE,

v.

SOFIA E. FINDLEY, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CLARA ELIZABETH CRAIG, DECEASED

Citator

Cited By

• City OF Miami Beach v. Greater Miami Hebrew Acad., 108 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)
  …as in no position to contend that the change was needed to prevent virtual confiscation of his property or a taking thereof without due process of law. Forde v. City of Miami Beach, 146 Fla. 676, 1 So. 2d 642; cf. Ehinger v. State ex rel. Gottesman, 147 Fla. 129, 2 So. 2d 357. Therefore, in ordering, in effect, that these seven residential lots be spot zoned to allow them to be used in a manner prohibited by the city’s zoning ordinance, the learned chancellor committed error by substituting his judgment fo…
• City of Miami v. Ross et ux., 76 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 1954)
  …y the growth- of business and commerce affects only one particular property —where there is no other property in the immediate area identically situated. Compare Lippow v. City of Miami Beach, Fla., 68 So. 2d 827; Ehinger v. State ex rel. Gottesman, 147 Fla. 129, 2 So. 2d 357. Here, the conditions which render the plaintiffs’ property unsuitable for residential use are general and applicable to the entire district in which their property is located. Their application to the zoning officials for a change in…
• Segal v. City of Miami, 63 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 1953)
  …greatly impair the residential value of the neighborhood. The facts peculiar to the- particular case must govern in contests of this nature and for this reason the cases of Forde v. City of Miami Beach, 146 Fla. 676, 1 So. 2d 642, Ehinger v. State, 147 Fla. 129, 2 So. 2d 357, Ex parte Wise, 141 Fla. 222, 192 So. 872, Town of Surfside v. Normandy Beach Development Co., Fla., 57 So. 2d 844, 845, referred to by appellant, cannot be applied to the present controversy, although apparently stating applicable pri…